9/11 The Smoking Guns

Are you trying to quit smoking cigarettes? If you are, you might want to try electronic cigarettes, otherwise known as electric cigarette or e-cigarettes. These are basically smokeless cigarettes that work by drawing a water vapor into the lungs of the smoker. They can taste like tobacco or something else, but the idea is that the electronic cigarette simulates a real cigarette, thus making the smoker feel as if he or she is actually smoking.

The idea is to wean the smoker off of real cigarettes by giving the smokers a less harmful substitute. Manufacturers say the benefits of these smokeless cigarettes are that they have no tobacco, carbon monoxide, tar or other cancer-causing chemicals inside them.

The health industry and government health officials have yet to conclusively say whether an electronic cigarette is a good alternative to actual smoking. There is some nicotine in the smokeless cigarettes, but much of what is inhaled is water vapor. Much of the appeal to the user might be in the fact that he or she is performing an action that looks and feels like the smoking of real cigarettes.

Some studies have found that those smokers who tried the smokeless cigarettes as a way to wean themselves off real cigarettes were successful. Others in the medical field have said it isn’t clear whether the smokeless cigarettes have no side effects.

The way these smokeless cigarettes work is as follows: the smoker brings the e-cigarette to his or her lips and inhales. When air flows through the cylinder, which is metal, a processor is ignited. This processer creates droplets of liquid that cause a nicotine vapor mist. The mist resembles smoke, but is not the same kind of smoke that is created by real cigarettes.

Smokeless cigarettes might become popular for different reasons. People seem to be very health conscious these days. You can no longer smoke real cigarettes in most restaurants. Children can’t remember the days when you could walk into a restaurant and the host or hostess would ask you “Smoking or non-smoking?” Now, there is no choice. In New York City, smoking was banned this year in public parks. That means even outside, in certain places, people aren’t allowed to smoke.

For these and other reasons, smokeless cigarettes might become popular. If it turns out that the general populace doesn’t object to being present in restaurants where other patrons are smoking electronic cigarettes, then there’s no reason why they might not sell very well. The second-hand smoke that might be inhaled by non-smokers who happen to be near a smokeless cigarette is not full of tar and other chemicals. In this sense, there might be less to object to.

As the United States becomes more health conscious, those who smoke real cigarettes are decreasing in number. Many people now look at the smoking of real cigarettes as a habit that everyone should rid themselves of. If you see someone smoking in a restaurant tomorrow, check first with them to see if they are smoking a real cigarette or a smokeless cigarette.

If you have been buying ecigarettes online for a while, you know it can sometimes be tricky to know which companies to deal with and which ones to avoid at all costs. In order to help make sure you stay safe when buying ecigs online, we have put together a list of tips and techniques that you should follow. Buying ecigs online is safe, but you really need to make sure you’re careful with any shopping you do on the Internet.

● Reputable Brands – While you may more (or you may not – you might be surprised) going with a well known brand of electronic smoke is a good idea. From knowing you are going to get quality products to knowing the company isn’t going to take your money and run, there are benefits to going with a well known name for ecigarettes.
● Starter Kits – If you’re brand new to ecigarettes and don’t know which brands you should stick with, make sure you go with a starter kit. You can save money and make sure you get everything you need to get started with electronic cigarettes.
● Ongoing Relationship – You are eventually going to need a new battery, atomizer, or at least smoke juice nicotine cartridges. At this point, you should stick with a good company that you find. This can make sure you always have your ecig stuff on hand – with back-ups if necessary. When you compare the cost of traditional cigarettes – even one pack a day – you are going to be surprised at the money you can save.

When it comes down to it, buying an electronic cigarette online is safe if you are careful. And when you shop online for ecigs, you can save quite a bit of money over time. This is really good news if you smoke even one pack of old cigarettes a day. With electronic cigarettes, you can save when you shop safely for ecigarettes.

In 1999, Washington-based war-mongering think-tank The Project for a New American Century (PNAC) asked their top “thinkers” (including Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz and Perle) to outline a Pax Americana for the new millennium. Their paper, entitled “Rebuilding America’s Defenses”, called for a return to Cold War levels of defensive spending, expansion into space-based weaponry, and strategic repositioning of the USA in the Middle East for control of natural resources. However, the report warned that such a transformation

“… is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.”

Warmongerer
Richard “new” Perle “Harbor”

Former German defense secretary and Minister of Technology Andreas von Bulow has been outspoken in casting doubt on the official story. He stated in an interview with Alex Jones:

“So for me… the official version [of 9/11 is] not credible at all, it’s totally incredible. The second solution for me is a covert operation. And this is a way to influence, to brainwash the American people into [a] long, long, ongoing conflict with the Muslim world…”

Andreas von Bulow

For the first and only three times in history, steel-frame buildings collapsed due to “fire”. The black smoke clearly visible was indicative of a cool, inefficient, oxygen starved fire, rather than the towering inferno that the official account would have us believe. The fires were soon contained by firefighters, but the buildings stood for only 102 and 56 minutes respectively before collapsing.

The official story of the “pancake theory”, whereby fire induced structural failure caused each floor in turn to collapse into the one below in cascade, is incompatible with the fact that the collapses of WTC 1 & 2 happened at near free-fall speed (around 10 seconds). Even if we suppose that a “pancake” collapse is theoretically credible, it’s speed must still be significantly less than that of free-fall, as each floor, support and buttress will provide resistance to any falling material. Then we must further suppose that all this can happen in near-perfect symmetry, twice in a row.

Many witnesses have come forward to describe how they witnessed bombs exploding in the buildings including firefighters, police, maintenance staff and other survivors. The concrete from the buildings was pulverized into the super-fine crystalline dust that covered lower Manhattan, an effect only expected of high-explosives. Many anomalous explosions and smoke puffs are visible throughout both collapses.

‘BOMBS INSIDE WTC’ – FIRE OFFICER SAYS FIREMEN, COPS KNOW TRUTH

NEW YORK CITY, N.Y.—On the morning of Sept. 11, 2005, New York City auxiliary fire lieutenant Paul Isaac Jr. asserted, yet again, that 9-11 was an inside job. “I know 9-11 was an inside job. The police know it’s an inside job; and the firemen know it too,” said Isaac.

… Isaac reiterated what a 9-11 survivor told this journalist during our protest at Ground Zero on Sept. 11, 2005—that emergency radios were buzzing with information about bombs being detonated inside the World Trade Center towers.

Also, Isaac directly addressed a gag order that has been placed on firemen and police officers in New York.

“It’s amazing how many people are afraid to talk for fear of retaliation or losing their jobs,” said Isaac, regarding the FBI gag order placed on law enforcement and fire department officials, preventing them from openly talking about any inside knowledge of 9-11…

American Free Press, 2005

Senior north tower janitor William Rodriguez was heralded as a hero for saving the lives of numerous people trapped in the burning tower. He claims that his statements of explosions in the basement before the impact of the plane were consistently cut from his network television interviews, and his evidence to the same effect given to the official 9/11 Commission disregarded. Said Rodriguez in a telephone conversation:

“What really upsets me is that we have all these people coming forward with credible testimony about explosions and we have been completely ignored by the 9/11 Commission and the major media… [T]he American press, they have locked their doors on all of us, never allowing our stories to surface or even trying to investigate why the 9/11 Commission didn’t bother to include out statements in the final report… What does that tell you?”

William Rodriguez

In his paper entitled “Why Indeed did the WTC Buildings Collapse?”, Professor of Physics Steven Jones of Bringham Young University, Utah calls for a “serious investigation of the hypothesis that WTC 7 and the Twin Towers were brought down, not just by damage and fires, but through the use of pre-positioned cutter-charges [explosives],” and includes key points which Jones and many others feel have not been addressed by the FEMA, NIST, or 9-11 Commission Reports. He goes into detail about the large pools of molten metal that were observed for days under all three buildings.

A video clip provides eye-witness evidence regarding this metal at ground zero. The observer notes that the observed surface of this metal is still reddish-orange some six weeks after 9-11. This implies a large quantity of a metal with fairly low heat conductivity and a relatively large heat capacity (e.g., iron is more likely than aluminum) even in an underground location. Like magma in a volcanic cone, such metal might remain hot and molten for a long time — once the metal is sufficiently hot to melt in large quantities and then kept in a fairly-well insulated underground location….

Thus, molten metal was repeatedly observed and formally reported in the rubble piles of the WTC Towers and WTC 7, metal that looked like molten steel or perhaps iron. Scientific analysis would be needed to conclusively ascertain the composition of the molten metal in detail.

I maintain that these observations are consistent with the use of high-temperature cutter-charges such as thermite, HDX or RDX or some combination thereof, routinely used to melt/cut/demolish steel. Thermite is a mixture of iron oxide and aluminum powder. The end products of the thermite reaction are aluminum oxide and molten iron. So the thermite reaction generates molten iron directly, and is hot enough to melt and even evaporate steel which it contacts while reacting.

Thermite contains its own supply of oxygen and so the reaction cannot be smothered, even with water… On the other hand, falling buildings (absent explosives) have insufficient directed energy to result in melting of large quantities of metal.

Prof. Steven E. Jones, Why Indeed did the WTC Buildings Collapse?, 2005

Neither the 9/11 Commission, FEMA or NIST reports mention the molten metal. Prof. Jones appeared live on MSNBC news to discuss his paper with a hostile Tucker Carlson.